The
other day I talked about movies which spawned sequels that were totally
unnecessary. I said that while once in awhile this works, overall these
sequels are just lame cash grabs. But there was one kind of sequel I
did not talk about. What happens when a sequel is expected, because the
first movie just naturally lends itself to a follow-up, but in the end
it still sucks?
These can be even
harder to accept because the sequel was a given and if a little effort
had been put in it would have been great! It is amazing, you get the
same cast and basically the same creative team, you would expect a movie
on par with the original. Right? Not always. Here are five exmples of
much anticipated sequels which turns out to be huge let down's :
Karate Kid II
You
could argue the first Karate Kid was a good movie on its own and did
not need a sequel. Fair enough, but I could see how a sequel could have
worked. And this movie had the right idea, it starts off immediately
after the first movie ended and continued the story just focusing on
Mr.Miagi. What went wrong? IT WAS BORING AS HELL! My lord, this was one
of the dullest films ever and I remember nothing except the opening
scene.
MIB II
You
can just tell this was rushed with no thought put into it at all. Just
do the same jokes as the previous movie, no one will notice! Men in
Black was a great little movie starring Wil Smith and Tommy Lee Jones. A
sequel made perfect sense, but rather than coming up with a new take
the creators created a horrible script
with no thought put into it. The movie was just awful. I don't know
which was worst, the contrived way they brought Tommy Lee Jones back or
the total waste of Lara Flynn Boyle. I know MIB III was better but I still haven't seen it.
Charlie's Angels-Full Throttle
I
really kind of liked Charlie's Angels. Yeah it was eye candy with no
substance, but it was a lot of fun. The female leads Drew Barrymore,
Cameron Diaz, and Lucy Liu had good chemistry and the pacing moved fast
enough to make for an enjoyable ride. That film should have led to a
whole series, instead we got one horrible sequel. The plot was just dumb
and the far fetched stuff which the first movie got away with just
didn't work in the sequel. Demi Moore did make a kickass villain, but
the story was just bad and the film just a big flop.
Ghostbusters II
I
haven't talked about how much I loved Ghostbusters. It should be on a
my list of top 10 films (I should really make that list sometime). It's
got just enough blend of character, comedy, action, and is even scary as
hell in moments! A sequel was inevitable, and five years later we got
one. And it was awful! Now I will be fair, I have not watched this in a
long time and it's possible it's not quite as bad as I remember it. But
how do you botch this up, especially after having so much time to work
on it? The story was dumb, and animating the Statue of Liberty at the
end? C'mon! Peter McNichol was a terrible bad guy and advancing Rick
Moranis's role didn't work for me. I want to see the real ghostbusters!
(no pun intended). It was reported that the creators were pressured into
making this sequel, and man does that show in this lifeless product. The worst thing was Bill Murray who clearly didn't want to be in this.
Star Trek V-The Final Frontier
Imagine
it's 1986. Star Trek IV has just come out, and exceded all
expectations. This film was a monster hit, attracting audiences that
couldn't care less about Star Trek. I was 12, and LOVED Star Trek IV.
When that film ended it practically promised new adventures would be
coming. I was very excited at the prospect of the next movie. Two things
happened to kill it. One, Next Generation came on the air which diluted
that excitement a bit. Two, and worst, was that William Shatner came up
with the story and directed. I already did a whole article on this so I
don't think I need to get into much detail. The plot was full of holes,
the special effects were weak, the characters were all wrong, and the
worst thing was the awful "humor" in the movie which just made the whole
thing feel like a parody of a Star Trek movie rather than an actual
Star Trek movie!!!!
Those are five examples, sure I could come up with LOTS more. Before I go.....
Last
time I talked about how I hated the latest Indiana Jones movie. I was
surprised to see how many people like it! Now I stand by my opinion but I
also kind of felt bad. So to make things square I am going to admit to
liking a movie that most people hate. It is something that I have never
admitted to anyone.
I kind of liked Batman & Robin
Now
don't get me wrong, it's a bad movie and deserves all the criticism it
gets. But I just dont remember hating it when I saw it. I liked Uma
Thurman as Poison Ivy, the action was ok and some of the gags worked.
Alicia Silverstone did a decent job and the story was sort of clever.
Yeah George Clooney as Batman sucked, hard, and that story about Alfred
was LAME...but it had it's good points. It's not a great movie, in fact
if I rated all of the Batman films this would be the bottom of the
list, but I just can't bring myself to outright hate it.
So there, I admit liking a movie most do not. Next time I will talk about why I liked Spider-Man 3. Just kidding.
Karate Kid 2 is okay. You're right in saying that it's dull because it is at points.
ReplyDeleteYou're right about MIB 2. Luckily, MIB 3 made up for it.
I never saw the second Charlies Angels movie and I won't be seeing it anytime soon.
Now I have to disagree with Ghostbusters 2. It's not perfect but I don't think any sequel would be able to match the first movie. The sequel has its funny moments.
You're right about Star Trek V. I would know too.
Don't worry about enjoying Batman and Robin. If you don't take it seriously, it's not that bad.