I’m
very happy to be talking about this one because this year it’s actually
the 30th anniversary of when the film came out. It was November, 1986
and it was a monster hit. Because of it’s light tone even non Star Trek
fans loved it. This movie was a huge deal when it came out with all
kinds of press from talk shows to William Shatner even hosting Saturday
Night Live. We were excited about Trek when this came, we couldn’t wait
for TNG and were so hyped for the next movie (who knew then what we’d
get, but that’s another story).
I said before that finding things to hate would be tough. But not because it’s a perfect movie, just because I adored this movie and the more you love something the harder it is to pick on it. True story, my family and I were going to California the next summer and guess what movie was playing on the airplane? Yep, we were very excited! But years after this movie came out and seeing it three million times, I am able to take the nostalgia goggles off to be fair and pick on some of the things I either didn’t like or can easily nitpick.
The Klingon Ambassador
Don’t get me wrong, John Schuck was fantastic in the role. But what was this doing here? Except as way to catch people up on Star Trek iii it serves no purpose. If it was just hear to catch people up, why? Having the prologue before Star Trek III was kind of stupid but I get them thinking people may have forgotten WTOK. But by 1986 most people had VCR’s so we didn’t need this recap. It’s also never really followed up on, even in Star Trek VI which could you argue kind of follows up on it but not really. He says there will be no peace as long as Kirk lives…and end scene. Why didn’t they just have Sarek appear to plead his case, it could have ended the same way. Especially considering Genesis is quietly forgotten after this scene, we didn’t need to be reminded about it. Having the ambassador is pointless (though it does seem like an unwritten rule that if it’s a Star Trek movie there HAS to be a Klingon in it somewhere!). Oh and one last thing, where in the world did Starfleet that beautifully edited footage of the Enterprise blowing up???
I said before that finding things to hate would be tough. But not because it’s a perfect movie, just because I adored this movie and the more you love something the harder it is to pick on it. True story, my family and I were going to California the next summer and guess what movie was playing on the airplane? Yep, we were very excited! But years after this movie came out and seeing it three million times, I am able to take the nostalgia goggles off to be fair and pick on some of the things I either didn’t like or can easily nitpick.
The Klingon Ambassador
Don’t get me wrong, John Schuck was fantastic in the role. But what was this doing here? Except as way to catch people up on Star Trek iii it serves no purpose. If it was just hear to catch people up, why? Having the prologue before Star Trek III was kind of stupid but I get them thinking people may have forgotten WTOK. But by 1986 most people had VCR’s so we didn’t need this recap. It’s also never really followed up on, even in Star Trek VI which could you argue kind of follows up on it but not really. He says there will be no peace as long as Kirk lives…and end scene. Why didn’t they just have Sarek appear to plead his case, it could have ended the same way. Especially considering Genesis is quietly forgotten after this scene, we didn’t need to be reminded about it. Having the ambassador is pointless (though it does seem like an unwritten rule that if it’s a Star Trek movie there HAS to be a Klingon in it somewhere!). Oh and one last thing, where in the world did Starfleet that beautifully edited footage of the Enterprise blowing up???