Another Sitcom face-off, where I take two similar sitcoms
and decide which one is better than the other. The first two times I chose to
pit a great show vs a mediocre show, and of course the great show on. Last time
I put two hit shows against each other, and it was neck to neck. Today I
thought I would pit two mediocre shows against one another and see what happened.
So we have:
VS
In the early 90’s we got a show about a married couple coping with the everyday nuances of married life. Mad About You tried to be Seinfeld for married people, especially in the early days. In the end of the 90’s we got a show about a married couple struggling with married life.The King of Queens tried to be like Everybody Loves Raymond but instead of the parents being next door, Carrie’s father literally lives in the same house. Essentially the same premise with slight differences, but which show was generally better?
VS
In the early 90’s we got a show about a married couple coping with the everyday nuances of married life. Mad About You tried to be Seinfeld for married people, especially in the early days. In the end of the 90’s we got a show about a married couple struggling with married life.The King of Queens tried to be like Everybody Loves Raymond but instead of the parents being next door, Carrie’s father literally lives in the same house. Essentially the same premise with slight differences, but which show was generally better?
Let’s start by comparing out male leads.
ROUND 1-Male Leads
Paul Buchman vs. Doug Heffernan
These guys tried very hard to be good husbands. However,
that’s where the comparisons end. Paul was a professional filmmaker who had
made dozens of documentaries and is pretty well respected. Doug is a little
less ambitious, he feel in to a job at IPS (a rip-off of UPS), and has made himself
comfortable staying at this same job. He drives his truck around delivering
packages and is fine with it. Paul is much more neurotic, he tends to worry
obsessively even about the most mundane things. Doug is more laid back, almost too
laid back in fact as he would have no problem spending every day parked on the
couch staring at the TV. Doug also has a bit of weight problem and eats, a lot.
They are both good guys who try hard to make people happy; Paul loves his wife
and his dog Murray. Doug loves his wife and loves how strong she is, as long
as she isn’t aiming at him when she goes off. Doug also has to put up with
Arthur, and the fact that he can manage to keep his marriage healthy with
Arthur living in the basement is a real example of how strong he can be. The
problem is he just doesn’t like to apply himself unless he has to. So, who’s
the winner? Paul is a good guy but I think he has more flaws. He is neurotic
and tends to be self absorbed, almost to the point where everything has to be
about him and when something good happens he insists on full gratitude even if it’s
at the expense of others. Doug has his problems too but he is more easygoing,
and just a better guy.
WINNER-DOUG HEFFERNAN
ROUND 2-female leads
Jamie Buchman vs. Carrie Heffernan
Jamie and Carrie are both hard working women trying to make
their lives better. Carrie works as a legal secretary with dreams of moving to
Manhattan. Jamie works in PR and in the beginning had the show had a high profile job, in the end she had her own
company with her best friend. Jamie was also neurotic but she had it
under control a little better than her husband. She seemed to have a better
sense of where to draw the line, where usually Paul would just go off. Carrie
had anger issues; if anyone crossed her then she would unload on them. There
are many episodes where we people genuinely afraid of her. Carrie also had
trouble accepting her own flaws, a trait which Jamie also possessed. Neither was
quick to admit a mistake, and Carrie would argue around Doug and throw insults
at him. Jamie and Carrie had sisters but Carrie’s disappeared during the run.
Jamie was a mother hen, she had to take care of everyone around her whether they
liked it or not. On the other hand both ladies did have a soft side and I never
doubted either loved their husbands. However, as both series went on Jamie went
from being cute and likable to almost shrill near the end. I could never
understand why this happened, but Carrie stayed pretty constant. However, I
still have to give the award to Jamie because Carrie was a little to mean at
times and domineering. Almost to the point where you wondered how Doug could put up with her
for a second.
WINNER=JAMIE BUCHMAN
ROUND 3-CHILDREN
Mabel vs. ????
I know what you’re thinking, how could I have this category
on here? It’s obvious that Mad About You would win because they had a child but
King of Queens never did. Well, not quite. The idea behind both these shows was
that they would not have kids. The shows were about a married couple, that’s
it. Mad About You decided it needed to change things after the horrible arc
where they almost split up (oh, we’ll talk about that soon) so they made Jamie
pregnant. This was such a mistake, having a baby didn’t do anything to help the
show. On the other hands, King of Queens stayed the course and for nine years
never broke formula by adding a child. So, I have to give credit where credit
is due.
WINNER=King of Queens
ROUND 4-SUPPORTING CAST
This is a tough one. King of Queens had Arthur, and Mad
About You had Murray. That may seem like a mean comparison but they hired a dog
walker to walk Arthur so I am sticking with it. Arthur was a maddening character;
he truly lived in his own world and made up his own rules. He also never took responsibility
when his decisions went awry. As for other characters, Mad About You started out
with a strong supporting cast, but that didn’t last. When the series started we
had Cousin Ira, Lisa, and of course Mark and Fran. For about four years of the
show this was a really good supporting cast, they were friends when they needed
to be. Then something changed, and except for Ira the supporting cast disappeared.
Toward the end the creators had to bring in Paul’s parents full time to get
some other people on the show. Just lame. On King of Queens we had Doug’s
friends Deacon, Spence, and Richie. Richie disappeared to be replaced by Danny
but all in all the supporting cast stayed solid. We also had Kelly, who was
married to Deacon. One similarity with these shows is that Mark and Fran split
up and almost divorced as did Kelly and Deacon. For a strong supporting cast that didn’t
disappear, I would have to give the award to King of Queens.
WINNER=KING OF QUEENS
ROUND 5-THEME SONG
Both these theme songs are pretty good. “The Final Frontier”
sets the tone of the series just as well as “"Baby All My Life I Will Be
Driving Home To You". However, Mad About You does it a little better.
WINNER=MAD ABOUT YOU
ROUND 6-PREMISE
Well, this where it always gets difficult. Which
show was
better all in all? Basically both series were about a married couple
facing
life. However, King of Queens tended to be a little broader in its
stories. The
plots pretty much involved Doug and Carrie get involved in situations,
and then
trying to figure out how to get out of the situation. On Mad About You,
it was
a more about life’s little annoyances that pop up when you’re married.
The
little conflicts and arguments that most married couples have. So, while
King
of Queens could be funny and well written I think it suffers from
episodes that
get a little too farfetched. Mad About You didn’t have this problem as
much,
and especially the first three years there is hardly a bad episode at
all. Yes, Mad About You had that horrible arc where Jamie and
Paul almost broke up. Sure, the episode where Paul and Jamie resolved
their problems was a very well written episode but that whole season of
shows just got darker and darker. It was a betrayal of what the show
stood for and it never fully recovered from that, I admit it. King of
Queens did it to but they saved it for the final episode rather than in
the middle
of the run. Another
problem as I indicated is that Carrie and Doug can be unlikable at
times, being
very self centered and even mean. Sure, Paul and Jamie argued but it
never got
into things like threats and name calling. There were times on King of
Queens
you wondered how they could stay married for a second, and on Mad About
You
that didn’t happen. You knew they were love, even when they argued. I
think I have to give the award to the show which, as a whole,
felt more like real life.
WINNER=MAD ABOUT YOU!!
ROUND 7-Jumping the shark
So, how we do we pick a winner? Which show is just simply
better? As usual, we will look at the final seasons and last episodes of both
and see which stayed the course better. This is going to be painful, because to
be honest both of these shows suck in their final seasons. On King of Queens,
Doug and Carrie’s darker traits were expanded on and they became almost evil,
and totally unlikeable. On Mad About You, the stories got sillier and sillier
to the point where it was like watching a parody of a sitcom. There were episodes
on a magic coin, a machine which could predict the future, and it just go so
dumb. It was embarrassing to watch these shows. King of Queens overall was the
strong show, I have to admit. Mad About You was just so bad those last two
years. What about final episodes? The final episode of King of Queens was kind
of convoluted as Doug and Carrie nearly split up, but in the end they wind up
with two children (one adopted). I loved the final episode of Mad About You.
Designed as a mock documentary, rather than look back the show looked forward
to what would happen to Paul and Jamie after the series. We see they become
lousy parents, screw up their kid, split up and almost divorce….again. Wait a minute,
what was this show about? I can’t believe
this, but I think despite the silly stories and broad jokes I have to give
the award to the show which stayed more constant and focused.
So the winner, to my surprise, is……
Final Thoughts-I loved Mad About You, when the show was good
it was really good. But the series just got so awful toward the end. King of
Queens had flaws too, but in the final analysis those last few years are not as painful to watch.
No comments:
Post a Comment