Another Sitcom face-off, where I take two similar sitcoms
and decide which one is better than the other. Today we have:
Cheers premiered in 1982 and was on until 1993. It was a
show about a bunch of guys who hung around a bar, with the bartender Sam Malone
being the focus of the show, and the group. A year after Cheers went off the
air, Friends premiered in 1994. This comedy was about six friends stuck at the
point in life where you aren’t sure where you’re going in terms of jobs and
relationships. These are both good shows, but which is superior?
The last two times I did this I featured family comedies.
Since these are ensemble comedies, I will need to use slightly different
criteria. I have to change the categories a bit because ensemble shows don’t
usually have main leads. Cheers main cast was Ted Danson and Shelley Long
(later Kirstie Alley). Friends is harder to separate, but for the sake of the
article I am going to say the main cast is the girls while the secondary cast
is the guys. You will understand why in a minute.
Sam, Diane & Rebecca, and Carla vs. Monica, Rachel, and
Phoebe
Sam was the center of the group, simple as that. The others
in the bar lived vicariously through him and his exploits chasing women all
over Boston. On the other hand, Monica was the mother hen of her group. She was
there, especially in the beginning, to watch out for everyone and take care of
them. That is why everyone always gathered in her apartment, it was as
comfortable as being home. Diane was the intellectual who wanted to be a writer,
what she was doing tending bar was anyone’s guess. Rachel was also a waitress,
and was also out of her element. At least Diane had a knack for the job, Rachel
clearly did not. Just like how Diane finally left to be a writer, Rachel also
quit to get into fashion. Rachel is also what Rebecca could never be, successful.
Rachel learned confidence and had great luck, while Rebecca took several blows
to her self esteem and couldn’t seem to find success in anything. Finally,
Carla was the mean one which had a very strong spiritual side. She believed in
god and had such a strong faith she even saw a fortune teller regularly. Phoebe
also had a spiritual side, less with religion but more metaphysical. She also
saw a psychic. Carla and Phoebe both filled the same role, to observe and if
necessary comment. However Phoebe was nice, and would never put people down the
way Carla did. So who wins? While Rachel as one character manages to take the
place of two, you can’t deny Sam is the center of that show. Without him, there
would be no show and I don’t think the same can be said for Monica. Plus, as I
pointed out in a previous article Monica had some serious faults. And Carla’s
sarcastic comments were much cleverer.
Winner=Cheers
Chandler, Joey, and Ross vs. Norm, Cliff, and Woody
These characters are very similar. Norm was the fixture of
the bar, always ready with a wise crack. Some of the funniest lines in the
series came from him. The same can be said for Chandler, he was always there
with a punch line. Cliff was the annoying character who always has a story to
tell. The only problem was Cliff wasn’t nearly as smart as he thought he was.
Ross was the other end of the spectrum; he was a smart guy who loved to ramble
on about things that his other friends didn’t care about. Woody was the dim
witted but good natured farm boy with the heart of gold. He truly cared for people,
especially his friends. He was just a tad dense at times. The same thing can be
said for Joey, except he was no farm boy. Both of these characters would do
anything to help another cast member out, and the other difference between the
two is Woody ended up married. So who wins? I think Friends takes this one,
because Ross, Joey, and Chandler have more to their characters than just being
a punch line. I will actually be talking about this more in a few minutes.
Winner=Friends
Round 3, Best Romance
Ross and Rachel vs Sam and Diane
If you saw my Valentines article you understand why this
article was put off. I didn’t want to have two discussions on the same topic.
In a nutshell, Sam and Diane were the couple everyone wanted to see together on
Cheers, while Ross and Rachel were the same on Friends. Both these couples were
great together and both had their ups and downs. However, I have to give the
award to the couple who were together in the end. Of course, that was Ross
& Rachel.
Winner=Friends (Ross & Rachel)
Round 4, Supporting Cast
Frasier started as a supporting member of Cheers
and
became a recurring one, as did Lilith and several barflies including
Paul. Norm’s
wife was never seen but was spoken of so often she felt like a
character.
Unfortunately, Friends can’t beat Cheers in this category. Their
supporting
cast consisted of Gunther at Central Perk and maybe Ross’s son who we
hardly
saw. Ross and Monica's parents were around every so often but as funny
as they were they still can't compete. Of course there were boyfriends
and girlfriends but they always came and
went, and were never heard from again. I give credit to the writers of
Friends
for keeping things fresh with the same six people for so long, but for
the sake
of this category Cheers is the clear winner for bringing in new
characters so
memorable that we wanted to see more and more and yet they never took
anything
away from the regular cast.
Winner=Cheers
Round 5 Theme Song
This is a real tough one. “Where Everybody Knows Your Name”
is a great song, but so is “I’ll Be There for You”. Back in the mid-90’s this song was all over
the place. Unfortunately, it was on so much it got annoying. So, I will give
the award to the show with more classic theme.
Winner=Cheers
Round 6, Premise
Of course there are over 200 episodes for both of these
series. These shows were both huge staples for NBC; they were consistent
programs which the network had no doubt about. Cheers was basically about a
bunch of friends in a bar, while Friends was about a group of friends who sat
around a coffee shop. Both these shows were smartly written and very funny,
with great jokes and gags. The thing that makes Friends stand out is the way
the stories were created. Every episode had three stories, so there was never
an episode where a character was short changed. Also, for the most part the
stories were pretty separate and it was the case that if you didn’t like one
story, you might want to tune in for the other. Cheers had more of a standard
sitcom premise, there was an A story and a B story, which was just a filler
story to get some laughs and screen time with the other characters. While every
character got a line, many episodes were not balanced evenly especially during
the days when Sam and Diane dominated the show. So, I give the award to Friends
for just being much more fun to watch because there are many episodes of Cheers
that if you don’t like the main story, then there isn’t much left beside some
jokes thrown in here and there.
Winner=Friends
Round 7, JUMPING THE SHARK
Normally how we decide the winner is by looking at which
show jumped the shark the worst. However, this isn’t as cut and dry as it was
before. Both of these shows were pretty consistent, and had very good final
seasons. The last episode of both series was very well done, being heartwarming
and memorable.
I was almost ready to just call this a draw, except for one
thing. The big difference between these shows is that on Cheers the characters
all stagnated. They hung out night after night at that bar, never really living
or changing. This was pointed out by Diane in the final episode when she
commented on how Cliff and Norm were exactly the same. Norm and Cliff tried to
point out how they had changed, but came up with nothing. Of course they didn’t,
this was the kind of show where if a character had an episode where they developed
as a character, it was reversed for the next episode. Friends was not like
that, all the characters were allowed to grow and change. Chandler matured,
Rachel learned how to be responsible, Joey went from being a jerk to a great
friend. In fact the characters from the first season seem very different from
the way we leave them in the final season. So, this is a tough call since both these
shows were smartly written, well acted, and pretty funny.
However I am giving he award to the show that allowed it
characters to change and mature, which in turn kept us interested because we
really wanted to see what happened next. The winner, by a nose, is…….
Final Thoughts-I don’t mean to take anything away from
Cheers, it was a fantastic show. I just think we related to the characters on
Friends more as people, rather than just jokes.
You forget that cheers was filmed in front of a live studio which changes the dynamic. Which if you take into account means there can be absolutely no argument that cheers is by far better.
ReplyDeleteFriends was also filmed in front a live audience (even if they didn't announce it every episode) so you're reasoning is flawed.
DeleteRoss was one of my favorite characters, which friend character do you like? https://bit.ly/FriendsCharacterApp
ReplyDeleteF.r.i.e.n.d.s is the best
ReplyDelete